Don’t tell Hutch that! Hutch said it was injuries, and that all they need is the get healthy.
No. This Lions group, ESPECIALLY with regards to the defense, has become undeniably complacent. Even the infamous “we’re good” was about the defense. I think the Lions coaches have fallen in love with their players, and they don’t see where they can do any wrong.
@frm710 posted this thread DetNews: Lions final grades: Defense substandard at multiple levels in 2025
When specifically talking about the defensive line, the Detroit News cited that 15 of the 49 team sacks came from linebackers. The defensive line had the 3rd lowest time to pressure and that Detroit Stat Padford’ed 32 of their sacks against poor OL teams.
Here is my thing. I am glad the Detroit News posted this info, however I will ask it again. WHY is this question NOT asked in the Brad Holmes press conference? They ask about sacks, Holmes replies with his typical “we had 2 guys with 10 sacks, what else do you want?” and there is NO followup on the time that opposing QB’s have, which is the most alarming stat. I’d happily accept 10 less sacks if it meant we were getting legitimate pressure and forcing immediate throw aways.
As far as the scheme, that’s exactly why many of us have said we would not be crushed if Kelvin Shepperd gets the Miami HC job. Truthfully, I think the Lions need to look outside of the building for both OC and DC (if it happens) because they need some new voices in leadership. Continuity is great, but it also can breed complacency. Think of how many times managers dismiss clearly bad behavior or effort with the answer “well, they’ve been here a long time, what do you want me to do?” Simple, I want you to do the job you are paid to do.