Again…where did I say you were anti-Fields?? It can’t “seem like it”…either I said it or I didn’t 
Bruh… there’s something called implication. The fact you keep replying to me after my straight forward posts certainly brings that into question
I would assume management has answered your response
Of course let’s say if Fields turns out to be the second coming then it’ll go down as a major blow it, that being said, they appear to be building a team which maximizes JGs strengths, which I believe is a good thing
2 Likes
Ok please quote the “implication”….in any response the only thing I directed at you was you calling for HSV to give his opinion then calling HSV out for doing exactly what you asked him to do. Nothing that I said about Fields was directed at you not was it even implied. If I wanted to attribute something to you about Fields then I would just do that. But you never said anything about Fields so I never directed or implied anything about Fields to you.
Like I said, it’s the repeated circular posts. Bro not gonna repeat myself again. Just look at the topic of the thread…. Not gonna waste my time with circles
You can’t even quote me on what you are accusing me of…that is why you are going in circles my friend 
Look at the first line of this sentence smart ass.
Aren’t you the one bringing up Fields supporter? I was Fields supporter myself. But not anymore. What are tryna argue if I was a Fields supporter myself?
what sentence? quote it… 
“He’s a fields supporter”
But that is not talking about you…thats talking about HSV…yes he is a Field’s supporter so you knew damn well when called into this thread he would defend Fields. I am still looking for when I implied that you were anti-Fields. In no response did I do such a thing.
Ok he’s a fields supporter.
So what do u think I was? If I was also a strong fields supporter, would u be replying back to me 
Jesus I shouldn’t need to be teaching someone what implication means.
You probably thought I was one of the guys arguing with u on whether or not to draft fields
Obviously you don’t know what implication means…again its why you are going in circles. Read every response to you and you will see that nothing I said to you was about your thoughts on Fields. You never said anything about Fields so how could I address or attribute you thoughts on Fields when you gave none?
Let me ask u again.
If I was a fields supporter, would u even bother replying to me
U clearly thought i was anti fields. Otherwise why would u argue with another fields supporter 
EDIT - sorry this didn’t go into the Fields debate u thought u were starting
If that were the case I would have come at the OP…who is clearly anti-Fields. That said, AGAIN, my very first post to you was you calling for HSV and then accusing him of hot-takes. That is the only reason why I spoke to you. For all I knew you could have been a Fields supporter…didn’t matter because when I responded to you it wasn’t about Fields, it was about HSV. So to answer your question yes if you were a Fields supporter we would still be talking about you calling for HSV and then accusing him of giving “hot-takes”…
Maybe u already had enough of the OP in the pre draft threads? 
I was neutral on drafting him so I didn’t care.
Yes your first post was that and that’s what I replied to on topic. Then you keep going on needlessly telling me he’s a Fields supporter.
Let me ask u again, would u be arguing with me needlessly if I was a Fields supporter ??
I just answered that question…so next question?
Ok so u want to argue with someone who is another fields supporter 
gotcha. Cus I already responded to your first post about HSV but u kept wanting to go on ??
Then I guess its over…we have nothing more to say… 
It should have been over long ago when I replied back to your original post
I guess…if you have to have the last word…sure 