Money aside…. who do you prefer???
Sanders but Chicago seemed more committed to using Montgomery than Philly ever was to Sanders.
I think Miles Sanders is a bit overrated but I think they’re fairly comparable. If I had to pick I’d go Montgomery but Sanders would be just fine to have instead.
At what point do we discuss that Philly had a top 10… probably top 5 OL for most of the “Sanders” years…. while Monty had… well…, Shitcago???….
Monty is a better player IMO. Less juice but a more skilled RB.
Yeah agreed. Kept hearing out of Philly that they didn’t think he could carry much of a load which is why they relied on Gainwell and Scott so much.
I was talking with close friend about those two RBs for Lions before when i posted the idea of us getting him. We discussed him an Sanders an we both decide if we were GM it would be Montgomery
Sanders for me. But content with Montgomery.
Sanders is a 5.0ypc back in the NFL, and was a 6.0ypc back in college
Montgomery has a 3.9 NFL average and 4.7 in college
When making excuses is the support you provide in making an argument as to why a player isn’t performing to the level of the other guy, the other guy is probably better.
I totally agree.
Sanders is a workout warrior…
but his OL was already great… and Monty was just as good.
Sometimes…. having a good O Line makes me think the guy might not be that great (yep… I mean Sanders)….