Money aside…. who do you prefer???
Sanders but Chicago seemed more committed to using Montgomery than Philly ever was to Sanders.
I think Miles Sanders is a bit overrated but I think they’re fairly comparable. If I had to pick I’d go Montgomery but Sanders would be just fine to have instead.
1 Like
Committed???
sure.
At what point do we discuss that Philly had a top 10… probably top 5 OL for most of the “Sanders” years…. while Monty had… well…, Shitcago???….
1 Like
Monty is a better player IMO. Less juice but a more skilled RB.
Yeah agreed. Kept hearing out of Philly that they didn’t think he could carry much of a load which is why they relied on Gainwell and Scott so much.
I was talking with close friend about those two RBs for Lions before when i posted the idea of us getting him. We discussed him an Sanders an we both decide if we were GM it would be Montgomery
1 Like
Sanders for me. But content with Montgomery.
Sanders is a 5.0ypc back in the NFL, and was a 6.0ypc back in college
Montgomery has a 3.9 NFL average and 4.7 in college
When making excuses is the support you provide in making an argument as to why a player isn’t performing to the level of the other guy, the other guy is probably better.
I totally agree.
Sanders is a workout warrior…
but his OL was already great… and Monty was just as good.
Sometimes…. having a good O Line makes me think the guy might not be that great (yep… I mean Sanders)….
1 Like