OL PFF grades

The Den
21

It does pass the eye test, unfortunately.

Something went drastically wrong and it was the trenches. Green Bay won the trenches, all day.

You gotta play to your players strengths. I get the feeling, stunts are not a strength?

22

Pups get a mulligan. Wont yell the sky is falling after a loss in gb to start the year with both guards as pups. Repeat this at home vs chitcago and i will be worried.

23

I was talking about AA.

24

you also have to consider it was 1 of say, 60 plays. Although I don’t know if PFF weights impactful plays more than routine plays. They might. But even if they do, AA had a very decent game overall.

25

That was a killer. I can’t give a great game score out to someone that yanked our chances of a comeback. But that’s just me.

26

I hear you… it was a very noticable gaffe. But how many times does a LB fill the wrong gap or take a bad angle on a run up the middle, say when the single high safety is occuppied on the sideline with a receiver? That’s a similar game-changer, just harder to notice. You have to look at his body of work.

1 Like
27

I think the mistake that you mentioned is less impactful, albeit still quite impactful, bc it does not involve change of possession. And I think AA had a return there as well.

1 Like
28

According to those PFF grades, GG wasnt the problem.

1 Like
29

He had a 34.4 run-blocking grade.

30

34.5 sounds rather replacement level. I know it depends on the opponent and all sorts of things. But I hate seeing that number yeesh.

31

PFF starts their scale at 60, soo…yeah, 34.5 is not great.

1 Like
32

Those numbers can’t be right. Decker a 73.5 lol

33

Woodward posted only pass-blocking grades for some reason. Half the story.

1 Like
34

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.