How is Suh even in the top 10?
He was good here for only 4 years. I mean, what is this list based on? So many good players that meant so much more to this organization than Suh!
Don’t feel bad I somehow missed him too and wondered why. Went back through the list and see him the second time. I guess that’s what happens when I’m trying to work and read the DEN at the same time.
Suh had 36 sacks in Detroit, Porcher had 95.5…and Suh hurt his team just as much as he helped them.
Suh was good but again, what is this list measuring: Stats, awards, accolades, longevity?
Can a player be great for one year and make this list? Without the criteria stated, this list is very incomplete.
I get that Suh was more dominant at DT than Porcher was at DE.
So is that what this list is? The best at their respective positions?
Like I was saying before, can someone be dominant for a year or two and make the list?