Cutting Goff would cost the Rams $65.2 million in dead money; trading him would cost $22.2 million.
So they might literally trade Goff to somebody for a 7th-round pick or something, just to save $43 million.
I definitely don’t want him back for the Lions. Not impressed at all. And he’s clearly persona non grata in L.A. the GM and Head Coach are not even couching their words about moving on from him.
This would be my second worst fear outside of Jimmy G plus 2nd. Goff was Holmes guy so don’t be surprised if he values him more than just about everybody else, something like Goff+#57 and The Den explodes.
I was always worried about the Rams being a possibility because of the Holmes connection and that fear might be realized.
“Can you guys help me drive up the price on your division rivals the 49ers? Small favor to ask that would really help us out.”
Why would Rams do it. Because it poses no threat to their chances of winning if the Lions receive more value for Stafford, but it does do damage to the 49ers if Stafford happens to join their rivals in San Francisco.
I honestly don’t think the Rams have a play in this trade. Seems reasonable to think this is nothing more than driving up the price on the 49ers.
Their entire draft this year (2, 3, 5, 6) and Aaron Donald and maybe we’ll talk. You figure out how to ditch Goff separately. (Frankly, I’d consider taking Goff and just cutting him; when you trade for a player, all the signing bonus money doesn’t come with the contract, and often much of the rest isn’t guaranteed).
However, the Rams are willing to part with #1 draft picks more easily than most teams. I think that’s because they were confident Holmes and Co. would find value in the middle and late rounds.