…Brockers is old, guys were hurt, dudes are young, etc.
I get to do whatever I want.
(just having fun with you, brother…I knew what you mean).
I catch myself being hard on Levi as well. It doesn’t mean he sucks. I have to remind myself too…they didn’t even expect the guy to play last year.
If we are trying to attach meaning, it’s that he was injured…THAT, my brother, is the meaning.
Secondly, 100% of GMs miss on some guys. If he missed on Levi, it doesn’t mean he sucks. He’s the type of dude that will move on from his mistakes very quickly and own that what wasn’t a fit…wasnt a fit. 100% chance you’ll see some fo that.
It also means → Brockers is old, Okras are always injured, and we still have a general lack of talent on the DL
It also means → we had such a ridiculous lack of talent when he came in that drafting two DL and bringing in Brockers and Harris wasn’t enough! Insanity, right? (but also true)
You know better than that. you’re just talking down to me in saying that.
I could throw a dart back at you here, but I have no interest.
I really think we get a WR this year too. I agree that they will most likely prioritize that, especially while we figure out what we have in Levi and Alim.
Massive assumption there. Nobody said that. Prioritize trenches does not mean ignore the rest of the team. Weird take, IMO.
My biggest thought is that maybe I have a longer sighted view of how they are building. We need so many guys that you could justify picking from damn near any position.
If our goal was 100% to build for winning as many games as we can THIS YEAR…your strategy is FAR better than mine…I agree with that.
I am seeing it from a longer view. Truthfully, the penetrating DT that I want (second only to a Josh Allen-type QB), is not available this year…so…I don’t think we should take him this year, if the right guy isn’t available (Long sighted).
If it’s just a “filling holes” approach, you will win more short term, but if you know it’s going to take a couple of years to round out a roster, you will get the roster filled out with either approach, but one will have the higher talent level. As far as actually evaluating talent, a lot of you guys are better than me at that. I can identify leaders very wellthoguh.
One thin g is for damn sure. We’re about to find out what they think.
Disagree on the reasoning.
completely agree there, in terms of what they will bring in.