Local boy Sieler was my first thought, but apparently his contract is really team friendly.
Them signing him is the only reason I donāt think theyāre tanking for Arch or whoever. Sign Geno or someone like that if thatās the plan, bringing in Willis says something else.
Of course they could also be tanking for Jeremiah Smith.
Theyāre tanking for Jeremiah Smith
Tank for a WR? Okay. 
They have their WR3-4-5 set with Washington, Tolbert, Atwell. They are just missing their 1 & 2 lol
I think Iād rather have Tootie instead of TuTu.
1 Like
I had thought the best way forward for Miami was to cut Tua and eat the salary cap turd sandwich while rebuilding around draft picks. Willis is on a cheap deal as far as veteran QBs go, so if he fizzles out they havenāt invested too much in him. I suspect theyāll take a QB who they think has starter potential in this draft just to see if they can get their guy now between Willis and the rookie. Itās worth a shot since they have the draft capital to take a flier on someone.
No tanks.
The Fins gonna look like an expansion team with that roster next season.
Might as well trade Achane. If I was the Bears, Pats, Panthersā¦would offer up.
They already have that guy IMO in Ewers. He wasnāt that bad in his limited time down the stretch.
But I think your overall outlook on the Willis signing is correct. Itās not a big deal type of contract that takes them out of the QB1 or 2 in next years draft. It gives them options. They are in a total rebuild with everything on the table.
2 Likes
Well Iām mostly being facetious. Itās more about ācomfortable with any of the guys at the topā situation. And who wouldnāt be in this draft? If it turns out Willis is worth it, then they can pivot to someone like Smith or Moore.
1 Like
I like Waddle. Super fast athletic reciever, but small. Heās good, but not great. Heās also hurt a lot. This is a terrible trade for the Broncos. They gave up way too much itās crazy.
We play themā¦ so this is good maybe?!
They have the potential to go winless
1 Like
I think the #1 pick next year would suit their plans nicely. They might as well cut ticket prices to a dollar and quadruple the cost of booze for this season.
1 Like
Poor Fins. As if losing Larry Borom wasnāt enough!
Itās a lot to pay for Waddle though. He looked great a couple of years ago but heās been injured quite a lot.
Makes you wonder what weād have got āpurely hypothetically - if weād been shopping Jamo. Who do we think would have paid the most and how much do you we think weād have got back in return?
3 Likes
Honestly I would rather have Jamo than Waddle. I actually think heās faster at this point and far less prone to injury. Plus heās 2.5 years younger. Waddle does the slot-receiver-y stuff better than Jamo, but thatās not the best way to use either one of them. I donāt know that weād get quite as much of a return, but I suspect it would be something like that. Other teams know the threat Jamo presents and what it can do for an offense or TO a defense. I think heās probably more respected in league circles than our own fanbase.
3 Likes
I could of seen the Giants before Mooney offer a deal for him Nabers/Jamo/Slayton/Likely would be really good for Dart not including Skat/Tracey/Johnson as options as well.
Could seen them doing like a Thibs and picks for Jamo type of deal
I could see a lot of teams interested, but yeah they would have been one. But I wouldnāt trade him for damn near anything. At this point heās a huge bargain.
I was told that he was only good as a system QB.
Dellfinitely!
1 Like