I’m just spitballing here because I’m a complete doofus who has no idea about the actual Xs and Os of the game…but I think I might be on to something.
Could it be that Holmes and Co. believe that you’d don’t really need a WR1 if you have multiple WR2s? Maybe they think that as long as you have multiple reliable targets who are good enough to get open and catch most of the balls that are tossed their way then you don’t need that prototypical dominant WR1. That might explain at least partially why they haven’t been in much of a rush to procure one.
Do you guys think that might be what’s in their heads? And if so, do you think that could actually work out? Has it ever worked anywhere else?