We don’t need safety help
3 Likes
“and would help shore up a defense that showed some vulnerability against the Seattle Seahawks in Week 4.”
tell me you haven’t watched this defense for the past 3 years without telling me you haven’t watched this defense for the last 3 years
that was a banner performance
2 Likes
We play 4-2-5 how often? Like a lot.
We dont have Barnes, so the 2 are gonna be some rotation of AA, Captain Jack and Rodrigo.
Who is more like Barnes…any of those guys, or Budda?
For those in the Let Brad Cook side of the DE argument that Pascal/Levi/UDFA guy is the answer, then this should be the add.
Budda lays more wood, and a lot of it behind the LOS, than Lexington Steele, and no I’m not talking about that Pierce Brosnan/Stephanie Zimbalist TV show…
1 Like
So…. you want some BBC?
Budda Baker contact?
.
4 Likes
You want an extra hat blitzing to be the answer for a DE?
1 Like
Its really more run support, and Barnes was a very good situational blitzer. The DE is there already, in the assumption above.
to answer directly, I want Hendrixkson/Crosby. If no, Then Reddick/Budda
1 Like
I like this idea
1 Like
Get both of em!
2 Likes
With Crosby we might not need a secondary.
We could trade them all and come out ahead.
2 Likes
We literally have been named a fit for every big name trade candidate just about the last season and a half .
At some point one has to come true I suppose, but not really expecting any move.
2 Likes
I will not allow myself to believe that Crosby is possible. Hendrickson and Budda come on down.
1 Like
You know my wife keeps saying she wants some bbc so i turn on doctor who or something and she doesnt even watch
2 Likes
so if we got Budda would that mean we lose Barnes?
Dude is a tool in the content creation world. Noticing a trend w your lions content WWS and now him lol.