I’m not positive I’m correct on this but I believe if we lose AG we get one this coming draft and then in 2026. IOW, not two comp picks in the same year.
If we lose Agnew in the same year as AG it is only one comp pick not two for Agnew.
If a team lost a minority executive or coach to another team, that team would receive a third-round compensatory pick for two years. If a team lost both a coach and personnel member, it would receive a third-round compensatory pick for three years.
Yep, definitely stack with UFA’s lost. There will be 32 comp picks for UFA’s lost, these minority hires are in addition to that 32. But I believe for instance we lose AG this year. We’d get a comp pick in 2025 and 2026. And if we lost Agnew next January, we’d have a comp pick for AG and Agnew in 2026 and one for Agnew in 2027.
One thing people don’t consider is the fact that comp beans are delayed a year. So we would not have the pick this offseason, it would be awarded next offseason. So we would be without the player or the pick for a year.
I think there is a sweet spot in which you have enough mid tier but qualifying talent flowing out in FA. That can then offset a big free agent or two and still be awarded some comp picks.
The key is having enough depth that is in demand league wide and being willing/able to fill out the back end in ways that don’t influence the comp pick formula.
A little known rule about using the comp pick for minority coaches is you can only take players that are a minority at their position. And then if they get signed away in free agency years later, we get an extra comp pick for that as well.
Coaches comp picks are usable immediately. The player comp picks are delayed by a year because the NFL needs to see all of the other signings that are made by the team. Then it gets awarded the following offseason.
In a vacuum, no… But that, combined with their max value contract (what they’re going to be seeking in FA), then yes, it’s worth losing them to be able to lock down Kerby and Hutch long term.
This is exactly it. The idea that we’re going to be able to retain everyone just isn’t real. No good team has ever been able to keep everyone together. A good or great player or two is going to come through here and have to leave. That’s just what happens when your team finds success.
Ultimately, yes. But there are levers to pull to push a pinch more austerity into the future allowing for one or two extra guys now. We’re not going to go full Mickey Loomis but the Eagles regularly utilize a more measured version of that approach, and being that they are likely our primary rivals for Conference championships I’d imagine we’d entertain doing so to keep pace.