28 DET _________ 209
60 DET ________88
for
39 CHI __________ 153
41 CHI ___________146
Almost identical value.
Would you rather have pick… 28,60 or …39 ,41
1 Like
Option C.
Lions give - pick #102 and 2026 4th for
Bears - pick 41.
Sorry that 5th year option is to valuable
2 Likes
In this draft, I’d easily rather have 39 and 41.
Which means the Bears probably also feel that way.
3 Likes
Maybe there is a LT they want to jump KC for. Maybe Starks falls. Maybe they want a RB.
With this draft i would prefer 28 and 60. There are too many good players in those ranges over that short range.
1 Like
This is one you have to do when our selection is up. We have to see who is available and I’m sure the Bears would want to make sure their guy is there before the trade up I would like to somehow add picks in the 3rd round. Maybe after that trade move one of those 2s in a trade down. Our 3rd will be a target for teams wanting to trade up. The last pick of day 2 and the 1st pick of day 3 are big targets.
1 Like
How would compare Buckeyes usage of their 2 RBs compared to the way we used our 2 RBs ?
Could Ben covet both Henderson & Judkins to try and mimick our backfield…I think so.
1 Like
I’m not giving up that 5th year option on the first round pick. We’re going to wish we had that with laporta.