It’s such an obstacle for Fox to have to continually work around. Great teammate, loves his buddies, but somewhat of an outcast because all of his buddy’s women want him. Brutal cross to have to bear.
1 Like
They would have made the SB run look like a 1986 middle school cake walk…Effortless victory!
No, don’t tell me the bean babies got to you!
Say it ain’t so, @BigNatty
1 Like
Haha! I’m just having lots of fun with it, man. I’m chilling TF out over here and enjoying the ride. I ultimately want the SB, and I DO think we’re building toward it.
Beans’ll getchya there, when you have a GM like Holmes.
That said, we’re gonna win some more games this year. I think we do a solid job in the 2nd half of the season…not the 10 that I wanted, but 7-ish.
If we got 5, that would be MUCH better draft postion.
This is what the ladies say after a night out with Jack Fox
2 Likes
Just think if they never wasted all those picks on Trey and used them to just draft more players around Jimmy?!?!
2 Likes
LOL - yup!
Exactly, they were very close to going to the super bowl last year with Lance standing on the sidelines holding a clipboard. Packers did the same thing trading up for Jordan Love when Rodgers needed weapons.
2 Likes
I’ve said that from the beginning. I was never a Trey fan.
But even if Trey hadn’t been battling the injuries, how much better would he really be in his 2nd year than Jimmy G. right now?
I mean, is a rookie QB going to take you to the Superbowl?..probably not.
What about a 2nd year QB?..that’s happened how many times?
So, now you have a 2 year window to win that Superbowl. Is trading all that draft capital worth the small chance of winning a Superbowl in a 2 year window?
Contrary to this narrative that you can’t win a Superbowl without your QB on his rookie deal is just wrong.
1 Like
If SF starts the season with Jimmy G they don’t lose to the Bears.
3 Likes
This topic was automatically closed 240 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.