Matthew Stafford and the Rams are finalizing agreement to keep him in Los Angeles
2 Likes
1 Like
Shocker
1 Like
Thanks
2 Likes
You could change the headline to “finalized” 
Well that a bunch of nothing.
1 Like
1 Like
Maybe if he was single I’d buy it. But not pulling those 4 girls out of school and tearing them away from their friends to move to frozen Minnesota. I mean that would need to be a lot of money. Which nobody is going to offer a 37 year old QB.
Why not, they’ve been giving it to him hand over fist his whole career. He is second only to AR in QB earnings I believe. That team is still in a position to compete at a high level, this ain’t no rebuild.
1 Like
Did the Giants have zero awareness of what was happening at The Meadowlands the weeks they weren’t playing?
2 Likes
Desperate teams do desperate things. Which is why, to me, it’s always better to just move on.
1 Like
What you just said sheds A LOT of what Brad was talking about the other day. Brad is so calculated!
2 Likes
Daboll cannot afford to bank on a young QB, he likely won’t have his job in 2026 if he does.
Not sure I could stomach paying Darnold a bunch of money so how many veteran options are there?
I still think it’s a bad move, but how many moves do they have to make?
2 Likes
I’m glad he’s staying in LA and not going to Minnesota.
6 Likes
Exactly Nate. I literally just said that to a co-worker who is a Giants fan and disappointed with the news. I said, I’m not because I was nervous about him going to the Vikings potentially.
2 Likes
Daboll is likely getting fired if they get off to slow start even…he had a good 1st year but straight downhill since. I highly doubt a 42 year old qb saves him.
1 Like
Wouldn’t you rather have Darnold than Rodgers at this point?
2 Likes
Im mean rodgers had better weapons with the jets. I really doubt he will be better there
what a bunch of dog shit-but it’s over.