The Ravens were gifted 3 points on a missed field goal

Missed field goal “called good” -Helmut to Helmut on Goff not called- insane call on Branch-DPI on Arnold in which his face mask was grabbed-Anzelone blatantly being held-Hutch being held constantly….. those are just the casual observance things. Worst officiated game this season.

3 Likes

How would they review it?

What do you mean by that?

I mean without a camera attached to the goalpost and pointing upward, what angle would tell them anything? From behind you can’t tell when it crossed the goalpost. From the side you can’t tell where the ball was when it crossed the goalpost. Maybe a top-down drone camera? But they don’t have anything like that yet.

Can’t they put a sensor in it like they did for the first down thing they are trying? Maybe i misunderstand that spot assist technology for first downs?

I think that’s based on cameras, not something in the ball.

And maybe? Not really sure how that technology works. I think it might use the cameras that are already there.

Honestly, for how infrequently it would be needed, I don’t really fault the league for not spending a bunch of money on it. Sure, they could afford it, but I also suspect the refs get it right 99.9% of the time. I think they probably got it right last night.

1 Like

Lasers!

Dr Evil Laser GIF

I am only speaking from theory not expecting them to actually do anything about it

aren’t the refs supposed to be standing directly underneath each goalpost? It’d be crazy calling it good if he saw that it wasn’t. I mean what is the rule for that? directly over is good? it wouldn’t be if it hit the goalpost. if it’s slightly toward center going over the top then it’s ‘good’ since it could ‘doink’ in?

They are, yeah, that’s why I think they probably got it right. Nobody in the stadium has a better angle. Acting like we can tell better based on TV angles is nonsense imo. They stand directly beneath the uprights and just to the outside of the goalpost. If they look up and see any part of the ball, it’s no good. It’s a fairly easy call for them, though obviously sometimes the ball is gonna pass really closely over the post.

1 Like

yes… they did say it is NOT reviewable.

1 Like

on the broadcast… the rules guy said ALL of the ball needs to pass over the outside of the goalpost.

Definitely looked to be a miss based on the angles we saw.

Well its 2025. The photo shows he missed it.

You have no idea where the ball is in that photo. Nobody does. It could be 5-10 yards behind the goalpost. In fact I expect it is.

3 Likes

Definitely thought it was wide watching it live.

Exactly, while watching I was like “he missed!?” Then I was like well actually I didn’t have the angle that showed when the ball would have broke the plane, I’m pretty sure they probably didn’t get that wrong. Way better angle on the ball than we did

Finally, someone who gets it. I thought he might have missed it too watching live, but when they called it good I knew I was wrong. I did not immediately jump to “oh they got it wrong.”

They could make it even more interesting and put a cross bar on the top

3 Likes