Yes, without having any information into their thought process, it would be playing smartest guy in the room to assume anything regarding what Brad and Dan are thinking.
But my point is why leave it open? Theres no down side of signing 2 more bodies. 0. Because if a player they want becomes available. You can cut one of the 25+ players instantly with 0 cap hit.
No idea. Maybe they have a specific couple guys theyâre waiting on - either injuries or theyâre deciding between a couple of teams. Anyoneâs guess is as good as good as mine. Unless that guess is âseems like smartest guy in the room stuffâ. Iâm sure there is probably some reason.
I mean, hell, the Rams only have 85 under contract according to OTC and Iâve been told that theyâve already won the Super Bowl, so maybe we have too many signed.
Câmon, @DBend144 . Do you really think itâs an oversight on their point or that they have no answer to your question. I have no idea but doesnât seem like much of a stretch to assume that they have solid reason for doing that. Nor does it seem remotely likely that it hurts the Lions AT ALL to not have hypothetical players #s 90 and 91 in the mix.
Nothing really begins until training camp. There might be vets that donât want to show up to the âVoluntaryâ OTAâs and they donât want to be criticized in the press for not showing up.