2026 Salary Cap

Now that we’ve picked up the 5th year options of Jamo and Hutch, the picture for 2026 is a little clearer.

OTC 2026 Lions Cap Liabilities: $326.7 million
Number of players contacted for 2026: 31
Projected 2026 Cap Per OTC: $295.5 million

Adjustments:

1 - Add $10.3 million to reflect the seven players that were just drafted. Their combined cap charge for 2025 will be $9.2 million and most rookie contracts inflate with the cap so I feel like $10.3 million is a reasonable estimate for next season, and it leaves us with a round $337 million.

2 - Rollover from 2025. Currently there is $42.4 million in cap space, but that will be reduced by about $3.3 million by this rookie class (as already mentioned it’s $9.2 million for the class but each player will knock a vet min player off the roster so the net cap reduction is $3.3 million), and according to PFT’s details of Kerby’s new deal, which OTC haven’t updated yet, his contract will come in with a roughly $300k cap saving in 2025. So that leaves $39.4 million as potential rollover money, but that will be reduced by accounting for the practice squad, and further veteran signings (Za’darius?). There’s no way to know what this number will be, but let’s call it $20 million in rollover to 2026.

3 - Kerby’s 2026 cap number needs to be counted too. That’s about $6.4 million.

4 - The 2026 draft class. This obviously depends on what picks are actually made, but I’m going to put $8 million in as the number for now.

Post Adjustment:

2026 Lions Cap Liabilities: $331.4 million
Number of players contacted for 2026: 39
Projected 2026 Cap Per OTC: $295.5 million

The Lions are currently roughly $36 million over the projected 2026 cap, with only 39 players under contract plus however many players are drafted in 2026.

Restructures:

  • Goff, roughly $40 million space created
  • St Brown, roughly $20 million space created
  • Sewell, roughly $15 million space created
  • McNeill, roughly $16 million space created

All these restructures would create around $90 million in cap space. It won’t be enough to just do Goff, but the more of these restructures that are done the more difficult things get further down the road.

Potential Cap Cuts:

  • Decker, $12 million
  • Ragnow, $13 million
  • Montgomery, $3.5 million
  • Glasgow, $5.5 million
  • Wright, $2.7 million
  • Fox, $3 million

I think we can all agree that Ragnow, Montgomery and probably Fox won’t be going anywhere for cap savings, but Glasgow looks certain to be gone now after this draft, and Decker and Wright might be expendable too.

New deals on the horizon:

  • Hutch (current 2026 hit is $19.9 million, that would probably come down with a new contract, but not by much)
  • Jamo (current 2026 hit is $15.5 million, that would probably come down with a new contract, but not by much)
  • Branch (current 2026 hit is $2.6 million, that’s likely to go up with a new deal)
  • LaPorta (current 2026 hit is $3 million, that’s likely to go up with a new deal)
  • Campbell (current 2026 hit is $4.7 million, which will probably stay broadly the same with a new deal)
  • Gibbs (current 2026 hit is $5.7 million, which will probably stay broadly the same with a new deal)

Conclusion

As you can see, there are lots of moving parts, but fundamentally the Lions are likely to be pretty tight to the cap limit in 2026. Pending free agents like Reader, Anzalone, Patrick, Robertson, Lopez, Levi, Davenport, Paschal, Raymond and other depth pieces are all likely to be gone (good news for comp pick enthusiasts!). The restructures are tempting, but they just push the problem into 2027 and beyond. Since we’ve not been here before under Brad, there’s no telling how he addresses it, maybe he restructures everyone and brings back a lot of the pending free agents to have a super roster in 2026, maybe he goes the other way and eats some big cap hits to give more future flexibility but the roster gets a lot weaker as the depth walks out the door. With the first four picks in 2023 all due new contracts the salary cap issue isn’t going to improve at all moving into 2027 and beyond.

My Prediction

Brian Branch is traded before or during the 2026 draft. Unless Sheila is willing to provide a ton of cash up front that will allow Brad to re-sign the entire 2023 draft class and keep pushing cap hits into the future, something has to give, and I think it will be Branch. Kerby just got paid and I personally don’t think paying two safetys is an optimal play when cap space is limited. Branch would have great trade value with a year still left on his rookie contract and with his reputation around the league. The Dolphins got a 1st for Fitzpatrick a few years ago and I think that’s a fair return for a player like Branch. Trading Branch wouldn’t solve the issue by any means, but it would grant a little more future cap flexibility and crucially provide draft capital to replenish some of the losses in free agency. Beyond that I think restructuring Goff plus one other, letting most of the free agents walk, cutting Glasgow and Decker, and hoping for or expecting the 2025 and 2026 draft classes to fill the holes of free agents lost is the best balance between shoving cap hits into the future and retaining a high level roster. But who knows, we’ve never been here before.

Interested to hear other thoughts on this.

4 Likes

Bold.

2 Likes

Yep. The thread is really just a premise for me to get that out there. I think something ‘unconscionable’ will happen either way.

1 Like

At some point something painful will happen because we can not literally pay everyone. It’ll be interesting when the first shoe does eventually drop.

2 Likes

My thought is Branch will be resigned. Cap goes up, restructures, cap is play money.

Not so sure on Jamo though. Top tier WRs are expensive. And we have one already.

Who knows? You might be right. But I don’t think the Lions ever shy on signing their own if they can, especially ones that ball out from the get go and are stupidly versatile.

Agree with your doubt about Jamo, but thinking about it, he’s completely unique. We can draft a replacement for Branch, but is there another Jamo out there?

Multiple player can and will get their contracts restructured.

Some aged vets may get cut or traded in order to save some space.

Theres multiple ways to make more room.
KCC went from having like $5m in space Feb 15. To having $60m before FA additions. With those moves.

Not worried at all. ESPECIALLY since the total spending is virtually $0 in 2028 onward.

Lots of ways to kick that can down the road that the lions really havent gone deep into void years yet like Philly.

DJ reed was the first one.

3 Likes

You need an owner who’s willing to front hundreds of millions of dollars for that. The Eagles are unique in how much Lurie has been willing to advance to build the roster, time will tell if Sheila steps up in the same way, but the vast majority of teams don’t operate that way so that might not be an option that’s open to us.

Personally, I like Branch better than Joseph.

1 Like

Trading Branch would be surprising but if we got a 1st rounder for him as you suggested… I could sleep at night. Brad Holmes first rounders have all been pretty darn good.

That’s what makes me think they will keep him. Versatility, solid tackling, very physical. These are things we prioritize. The fact that we resigned Kerby makes me think we will keep BB with the following caveat:

If they extend Kirby then they can keep both during this contending season and then move BB so at least we don’t take a step back this season. But I hope this isn’t the case and we keep him.

Actually… this is NOT how the Eagles are pushing money into the future.

They are using yearly “option bonuses”… which act like a signing bonus for cap purposes… to keep current cap hits lower and push more money into future “void” years… but don’t require a massive upfront paynent.

They aren’t paying significantly more guaranteed money than the Lions on new contracts…. which is what requires an owner to hold money in escrow… they are merely using accounting measures to keep the cap hits lower in the near term.

1 Like

So when Cap gets booted, Cap goes up?

I’d be very surprised if they trade branch

As of today I think Jamo is the odd man out. I think they keep him through his contract, as our superbowl window is now, you can always franchise him and trade him after year 5

Also don’t be shocked if Gibbs plays 5 years and is not given a second contract

1 Like

Way to early for me to see Branch being traded.

3 Likes

Gibbs and Ra play here as long as they want and their bodies hold out. Sewell too. If you are top 5 in the League at your position, blank check.

LaPorta gets Hockensoned as TeSlaa turns into a similar threat but cheaper.

3 Likes

Something has to give and Branch may be the odd man out. Brad is good at drafting safeties. But that decision doesn’t have to made now, and things could look very different with another year of information.

What if Isaac TeSlaa burns it up next season?

I think it’s possible. TeSlaa like Justin Jefferson too was dismissed because he was pegged as a slot receiver coming into the league. Yes, I went there, but just for your attention. (Compare their pre-draft evaluations by Lance Zierlein at NFL.com for fun.)

If TeSlaa burns it up right away, Jamo could be the one traded for significant draft capital while saving $30+ per year on the salary cap. In the coming year, does Jamo suddenly learn to track deep balls in contested situations? Does he survive his fun TD celebrations or go full Stephen Tulloch? Does he mature and anticipate consequences of his actions?

I don’t know and that doesn’t matter because everything is conjecture now, and conjecture is fun. In 11 month, we’ll have a lot more facts. And Brad will still have a deathgrip on the steering wheel.

2 Likes

After year 5, Jamo would simply wait until free agency, when all teams could negotiate with him without giving any compensation to the Lions. Trading Jamo after year 4 with one year of control left could be the time to try that though.

If the Lions use the “exclusive” franchise tag after year 5…
no team can negotiate with him.

Even if they use the “non-exclusive” tag… teams can negotiate…
but either have to agree to terms with Lions…
or Lions would get 2 picks in the 1st round if he signs elsewhere.

1 Like

True, they have leverage and could use that. But would they? Players hate that and it could have a corrosive effect on the team morale.