# Bryce Underwood compares favorably to Kyle Whittingham’s previous QB
,Underwood forced 18 missed tackles on 88 rushes (20.5% forced missed tackle rate), while Dampier had 27 on 146 carries (18.5%), according to Pro Football Focus. Underwood also had 17 carries of 10 or more yards (19.3% of attempts), notably higher than Dampier 's 21 such rushes (14.4%), though Dampier did have the edge in first downs, moving the sticks on 45 of his carries (30.8%) while Underwood did so 22 times (25%).
While Dampier had more than twice as many rushing yards and touchdowns as Underwood, the efficiency was rather similar, with frequency responsible for much of the difference. Dampier ran the ball at least 10 times in 10 different games, while Underwood only had one game with more than nine carries: the Cheez-It Citrus Bowl against Texas, when he ran 14 times for 69 yards and a score.
It’s why U-M feels it has a quarterback capable of mirroring that production.
==
… it’s worth noting how Dampier was used through the air, too. Last season, Utah’s QB was certainly more efficient than Underwood, throwing more than twice as many touchdowns (24 vs. 11), essentially half as many interceptions (5 vs. 9), and more passing yards (2,490 vs. 2,428) despite one fewer attempt.
Some of this could be reasonably attributed to experience, but there were also slight differences in concepts and route depth. Underwood had more dropbacks in play-action (36.6%) than Dampier (32.5%) in the regular season and also threw significantly more screens (16.1%) than Dampier (8.1%).
Underwood also took fewer deep shots, with 56.4% of his attempts all year coming with 10 yards of the line of scrimmage or behind it, while 52.6% of Dampier’s attempts were on such throws. But overall, the attempts were pretty close − Underwood threw 55 passes of 20 yards or more, Dampier had 54; Underwood threw 79 passes between 10-19 yards downfield, Dampier had 82.
One major difference? Dampier’s pass-catchers dropped just eight passes all year compared to 28 for Underwood.

That’s why Underwood’s adjusted completion rate, per PFF, was higher than Dampier on passes of 0-9 yards (85.0% vs. 82.9%), and deep balls (36.4% vs. 31.5%). For perspective, if Underwood had 20 fewer drops, that would’ve been nearly an additional 150 yards (based on his average completion of 7.2 yards per throw) and his completion rate would’ve been 66.2%, higher than Dampier’s 63.5%.
Point is, the underlying numbers were surprisingly similar between Underwood and Dampier in 2025. It gives reason to believe things could improve for the U-M signal caller in his sophomore season, with a better system, fewer drops and more experience. But the main expected difference is how Underwood will be used in the rushing game.