Move on to who? Aaron Rodgers?
Wonât mind having that problem wouldnât you? Stacked up on talent and got a solid squad now theyâre a QB away from competing you can take that chance and take a swing at it. No issue going after your franchise QB and missing, the problem is holding onto him and expecting different results, cut it lose and try again. Thereâs no difference to me a team going 9-8 and one going 5-12⌠if youâre not competing to win a Super Bowl and going far you gotta make moves and take chances, never settle for mediocre.
I kind of always thought of Stafford as a middling QB and Goff kind of fits that definition as well.
Sure but give up picks for ancient Rodgers and take on that abomination of a contract? No thanks
Iâm with you, I wouldnât do that, but if that organization believes heâs that piece to take them to the promise land then I respect that and I love teams that are aggressive, donât settle for being middle of the pack.
It doesnât paint a fair picture of who AR is as a player if all you are doing is looking at stats and charts. A big part of ARâs accuracy issues are related to his decision making.
and mechanics. but to your point, thatâs probably why the lion scouts leaked out they didnât know what was going on in his head in the huddle.
Even some of his mechanical breakdowns can be traced back to decision making. AR is an odd prospect to watch because he really does show you everything you want to see on film. The film improves over the course of the year, which is what you want to see.
If he goes to a team that has its shit together, he could be a real problem to deal with in the future.
This topic was automatically closed 240 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.