Would rather face Stafford than Jordan Love

Don’t care about Staffords playoff experience or Loves lack of playoff experience. Jordan Love is playing at a very high level. Put on the film last week of Love and of Stafford. There is no doubt who is playing better. I have been to every single game this year and Jordan Love was the most impressive QB I have seen this year. Huge arm, extremely mobile and also smart. Green Bay has a VERY good QB and he is going to be a major problem for years to come.

Packers are a bunch of lucky pricks found another good qb. If we did lose i would rather it be vs the rams.

2 Likes

I think we all knew Love would be fine. There’s a reason the Packers were fine with pissing off and moving on w/o Rodgers

The difference is, I don’t fear Love.

Stafford? He terrifies the shit out of me.

6 Likes

After watching that Giants game I get it

Agreed.

Repeating Love’s QB ratings from his last 7 games:

125.3 (Vikes)
109.1 (Panthers)
111.5 (Bucs)
76.7 (Giants)
118.6 (Chiefs)
125.5 (Lions)
108.5 (Chargers)

And, yes, though a pocket passer like Stafford, much more mobile than Stafford.

Don’t fear either of them. I’d expect the Lions to beat either team. AND I’d prefer to face Stafford fosho.

4 Likes

Stafford is tricky… cause he might throw 3 picks or he might throw 4 TD’S. Never know.which Stafford shows up. At least we know Stafford will be in the pocket.

Love extends plays and they get him on the move and rollouts a lot.

It’s going to be the Rams though

3 Likes

You and @woot should be posting in the Green Bay room.

Go ahead. You can have it. It’s all yours.

Really? Cuz I recognize that the GB QB is playing really well?

Dag.

I will say that Love looked amazing against the Vikings the other day. Probably the best I’ve seen him look all year.

Still am not convinced he is the future, teams will also adjust the more tape they have of him. I think he is a mid range starter in this league long term, similar to a Ryan Tannehill who’s first few seasons with the Titans.

1 Like

Love is good. Stafford is good. Both can beat the Lions.

It doesn’t matter who they play. Just hoping both sides of the ball come to play.

1 Like

Yes. You inspired this knucklehead with your other post.
Love and Stafford have 108 and 107 QBR, respectively for the last 5 games.
Yet this is the guy you WANT to face?:

That’s some serious Love love. Seems like the GB room would be appropriate.

1 Like

Yup. Love is playing better than Stafford.

Besides, as an embittered-former-long-time-Rams-fan, I would LOVE - HaAhhahahHaha! - to kick McVay’s A$$ out of the playoffs. The schadenfreude would be oh-so-sweet. And, yes, of course it could go the other way.

In any case, I’ll stay where I am, thanks!

1 Like

It’s all good, man, I’m just messin’ with you. I know there’s some history with you (and a few others) and the Rams and just wanted to rattle your cage a little bit.

On road:

Jordan Love 21 total TDs 7 INTs
Matthew Stafford 11 total TDs 7 INTs

Especially with our lack of consistent pass rush and weak secondary.

No way. He is 3rd in passing TDs in his first season as starter and has gotten much better as the season has gone on. He is playing at a level that Tannehill never played at.

Love has a floor somewhere around Ryan Tannehill or Derek Carr and a ceiling around Goff / Cousins. I’d say he can remain a starter for the next 8 - 10 years somewhere.

Don’t care who we play there are no easy playoff games.

But I wish love would change his name I mean every time my wife says I love you that aholes pictures gunna pop in my head

1 Like

Lol his ceiling is Goff? He is playing better than Goff now in his first season as a starter and Goff is having a career year. Who has better weapons?

It would be another stab in the front if Stafford beats us.