Zero Sacks

reacting youtube GIF by Rosanna Pansino

9 Likes

Less point scored than opponent.

Joseph Sikora Starz GIF by Power

1 Like

If only the NFL would implement the Hutch Rule we’d be set

13 Likes

Not sure we would have taken advantage of that today anyways.

1 Like

Should be called the Dan Skipper Rule or Jamarco Jones Rule…..had more to do with them than Hutch I believe.

2 Likes

The New Orleans Saints had 5 sacks today

The Patriots had 4 sacks today

The Jets had 4 sacks today and gave up 34 points

And the Browns had 3.

The Chiefs had 3

All these teams lost

2 Likes

That’s nice but how many pressures did we have today? ZERO in the first half, I think it ended up being 4 total.
That is 4 QB pressures
Hutch got a big goose egg going against a 7th round LT

Something doesn’t smell right, I think Dan and crew have been blowing smoke up the media’s ass about just how good Hutch has come back from that leg injury
Oh and Davenport, the guy with all this potential if he stays healthy, another goose egg from him.

You can downplay sacks all you want but they are an indicator of something much bigger on how the defense is playing.

4 Likes

Well I know I saw hutch and Davenport both dropping into coverage on 3rd and long in the first half. And playing man is great when it works but definitely wasn’t working today.

Scheme was also more vanilla than an Ivy league chess team.

5 Likes

Hopefully Hutch isn’t looking for $45 million a year with zero sacks.

Pressing Big Sky GIF by ABC Network

1 Like

Ravens are up 27-13 on the Bills with 0 zero sacks as we speak

I’m not saying they dont matter at all but I am saying it is not the end all be stat.

Hell the Bills have a sack and already given up 27 points 163 yards rushing and the 2nd half just started

I think so. Probably.

Jack one on one on Kraft was a terrible plan and it bit us in the ass. Once we adjusted the defense was fine. Defense would have been good in the second half if we didn’t refuse to accept Jordan Love’s turnover generosity on back to back plays.

1 Like

On defense we were almost getting too creative. Hutch and Davenport in coverage multiple times :thinking: the Packers just torched those looks

1 Like

yeah… that coverage thing is weird… because there wasn’t an overload blitz on the opposite side… it was just soft coverage with even less pass rush (if that is possible).

1 Like

I agree the defense seemed to settle down for the most part. It’s just when you hear all the hype before the season about how well Hutch is doing (The Hutch Rule) and how well Davenport looks, then for the 2 of them to have a game like this, pretty disappointing

And Hutch was up against a 7th rd pick at LT, Walker is OK, but he was in a battle for the starting LT during camp

We also sent quite a few blitzes in the 1st half that got absolutely no pressure. The Pack oline clearly was ready for us. We didn’t catch them off guard at all.

1 Like

yeah it was a game where in general we got punched in the mouth

next game is gonna be a big one for this team this year tbh, if they look like this at home against the bears?

concern

Right. The pass rush did suck. I’m not denying that. I think it will be fine. But it’s pretty essentially that we get 90-95% of 2024 Hutch. We clearly did not today.

We did get our butts kicked. But we also fumbled some great opportunities. Teslaa’s penalty on the punt gave them 32 yards and likely three points. Goff’s int cost us 3. AA’s drop may have cost us 3 or 7. Rock’s hold cost us 7. Just a couple plays that we make 9/10 times and it’s a tight down to the wire game despite being outplayed.

2 Likes