How does that refute my argument? Stafford was lucky his pick was dropped. Goff was lucky the DB didnāt get flagged.
Those true statements shouldnāt be controversial but for some reason the idea Stafford got lucky there sets you off
The entire point of the thread was to make light of the thousands of posts on the topic. I guess any humor that doesnāt involve mentioning how handsome other dudes are or how much hair that have goes right over your head
I donāt think, I know. And youāre showing you have a working understanding but not a true therapeutic/psychological understanding of the term. Like I have always said, you read a few books. Cool.
I didnāt say I would leave, I said engaging in your little game is pointless. Iām not going anywhere. You donāt have that kind of power or influence.
Boom! The reason I created this thread.
It was obvious we were never going to see an end of the Goff threads.
If you canāt beat 'em, beat 'em senseless.
I can create another thread so that we can cover the same ground for the 6,002 time, if you like.
Iām here to please.
Hereās how Iām seeing the evolution of the posts here
Argument: It takes skill, coaching, health and some luck to make a SB run. Stafford was lucky his arm punt pick was dropped. Goff was lucky his DB wasnāt called for PI
Merry band of uncritical thinkers: You have a double standard!! You say Stafford only won because of luck
Me: Please show me the actual statements where I showed a double standard and nobody ever said Stafford only won because of luck
Merry band of uncritical thinkers: āCherry picked goalpost passive aggressive word-soup significance driven ego-jibberish!ā
Me: Heres a thought maybe think critically about the actual arguments that were presented. Both QBs were lucky. Both QBs also made clutch game winning drives. Again whereās the double standard from me?
I take a breath before I post (if I feel anxiety, which I xonāt here, brother)
If you think Iām even remotely triggered, you are way off base.
If we were sitting at a kitchen table together, you wouldnāt even go to half of the things you do/say half of the things you say. I promise you that.
You canāt read energy nearly as well through text.
Whatās interesting is this whole exchange could have been avoided if you just posted my statements you thought were a double standard.
Iāve noticed when you donāt have a good argument and people press you on it you just start accusing them of all sorts of wonky bullshit and deflect by tossing out nonsensical meandering rants
Humor comes from somewhere. It is based on something. Humor can absolutely be used as a form of gaslighting. Sarcasm, deprecating, creation of division, etc. Us vs them to create teams & build yourself up by invalidating opinions of others. Itās like watching the propagandaā¦oopsā¦I mean news. Itās gaslighting.
Making fun of a race, religion, political group, etcā¦same exact energy you are bringing. Feels like Hannity &/or Maddow -type lens. You either agree w/me or you are a moron.
Recognizing that I created thisā¦& I am wasting my own time, as you canāt assist someone to see something they truly have no interest in seeing.
Josh Allen runs fast which make him better. QBās who canāt run sub 4.6/40 (the only stat that matters) are outdated relics and canāt win games in todayās NFL. I donāt even know why we have a Super Bowl, we should just have a QB foot race, winner take all! P.S. I love you all however my satire knows no bounds.
You think the following thread is on par with mocking race and religion or political groups? I get your humor seems to begin and end with saying so and so should be bald. But good grief. Iād say you take yourself way too seriously but youāll just accuse me of gaslighting
Wrong - Iāve done that before & it turns into bobbing & weavingā¦ sidestepping & moving the goalposts while cherry picking what to answer/not to answer. Forcing conversations into a certain framing. This takes 1/10th the energy.
The only way to avoid this with you is to not respond to your posts.
You have self-proclaimed that you ālove being rightā & that you ālike to argueā.
I have no interest in either.
I realize for some reason Matt is a hot button issue for you that is triggeringā¦& that things get amplified for you when itās concerning that topic, & that you show up differently in other conversations.
There are definitely some things that could change to bring you more peace.
is that what I said, or is this more gaslighting?
itās a parallel energy that it is divisive, creates separation out of ignorance with no attempt to understand.
See ā that is an example of your ādebate style,ā it is wildly dishonest, has zero has no accountability, & is always trying to paint yourself as a victim by putting words in someone elseās mouth. Gaslighting.
thatās what she saidā¦dontā leave that out or youāll miss the entire boat, ya handsome MFār!
If this is your take on me, you are in an extreme minority
Iām a frigginā clown 80+% of the time.
You have? Iāve never seen you actually address an argument without lapsing into gibberish.
Hereās the chance again. Kind of a do-over for you:
What are my statements that support your accusation of a double standard?
All you have to do is present them if they exist
When have I said āI love being rightā. Thatās a quote? Youāre also misquoting me on the latter. I said I like to construct arguments. In the Socratic sense. Itās literally what this board is for. Itās the foundation of discussion. How that perpetually flies over your head is baffling
Thatās ironic. Itās the hot button issue for you. The statements all QBs and teams need some luck when going on a SB run is reasonable and basically what triggered you. All I said was I found it telling that you bring up the missed PI as an example of luck in Goffs CC win but you fail to mention the clutch game tying and game winning drives. No warrior energy kudos there?
Being a clown comes from somewhere. It is based on something. Being a clown can absolutely be used as a form of gaslighting. Sarcasm, deprecating, creation of division, etc. Us vs them to create teams & build yourself up by invalidating opinions of others. Itās like watching the propagandaā¦oopsā¦I mean news. Itās gaslightingā¦.a gaslighting clown